HOME
THE CHAIRMAN'S MESSAGE
RE-STRUCTURING ARAB ECONOMICS
HUMAN RIGHTS AND  MODERN ARAB ....
METROPOLITAN PALACE HOTEL, BEIRUT
THE FINAL MISSION
WHY MILOSEVIC AND NOT SHARON
WOMAN OF DISTINCTION
ISRAEL - A TOOL OF AMERICAN ....
THE FINAL FRONTIER
ARCHAEOLOGY IN THE EMIRATES
DANGERS OF THE DESERT
AL HABTOOR ENGINEERING
HABTOOR NEWS
ABOUT US
BACK ISSUES

E-mail Us

Why Milosevic and Others?
How often over the last ten years have government ministers and officials of the developed western nations told us that governments and their leaders would no longer be protected by national jurisdictions and state sovereignty? They proudly claim that those responsible for human rights abuses, ethnic cleansing, acts of terror and war crimes must and will be pursued regardless of national boundaries.

These were the reasons provided by NATO to justify its 'humanitarian war' in Yugoslavia, and the hunting down of Serbian and Croatian warlords, the plans for an international war crimes court and the establishing of the war crimes tribunal in The Hague by the United Nations.

In 1993 with great fanfare and much rhetoric, the UN Security Council passed resolutions 808 and 827. These two resolutions brought into existence The Hague tribunal to prosecute war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. They were passed primarily to cover the Bosnian conflict, which was seen at the time, as a major threat to international peace and security.

It was this clearly stated drive by the western democracies to make war crimes and human rights abuses answerable internationally that inspired a citizen-led attempt to prosecute the Chilean Dictator Augusto Pinochet. However the proponents of this new doctrine of 'International Responsibility' have, while demonising the likes of Milosevic and Pinochet remained remarkably silent on other notable violators of human rights, particularly in the Middle East. The most glaring example of this failure to see, is their silence to call Ariel Sharon, one time General and now Israeli Prime Minister, to account for his well documented and acknowledged crimes against humanity. (See accompanying eyewitness account of the massacres in the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps in Lebanon).

Of course, he is not the only individual that should be tried, though currently, he is the most prominent one. The remarkable blindness of America and its allies to the crimes committed by Sharon and others like Peres and some Arab leaders, demonstrates the West's, particularly America's double standard when it comes to dealing with war criminals and human rights violators. So long as they are on the side of, and support America's and the West's global agenda, they are not merely tolerated but are celebrated and listened to. What other reason could justify America's, and its allies support of Israel's continued occupation of most of Palestine, although it has been declared illegal by the United Nations, or their failure to take action against this State that consistently deprives another peoples of their human rights.

While there have been many examples of the United States and its allies turning a blind eye to dictators and human rights abusers when it suits their strategic interests, Israel's aggressive and brutal suppression of the Palestinians offers the rest of the world an instructive current example of just how cynical it can be. It's failure to condemn Israel or indict Sharon while at the same time relentlessly pursuing war criminals in former Yugoslavia, particularly Milosovic, is based on politics rather than a genuine desire to pursue and bring to justice other violators of human rights. If the West was sincere in its commitment to justice, then it would do all in its power to see that Ariel Sharon is arrested and brought to court in exactly the same way that Milosovic has been. In fact, he should have been indicted and brought to trial long ago along with many other Israeli leaders, all of whom have a long and well documented history of terrorism, violence and murder against unarmed Arab civilians and prisoners of war.

But there are no indictments of Sharon, no official expressions of outrage at Israeli abuses in Palestine, no one is denouncing Israel's record of ethnic cleansing, no Western pressure is being brought to bear on Israel to quit the occupied territories. For Israel, there are no tribunals, sanctions or punitive bombings to put pressure on it to stop its human rights abuses and hand over its war criminals.

Let there be no mistake - Israel's current Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, is a war criminal. He is responsible for a long list of atrocities, all of which are worthy of war crime indictments, the most renowned being the Sabra and Shatila massacres. His crimes can be traced all the way back to 1953 when the commando unit he was leading dynamited homes in the Jordanian town of Qibya, killing 69 civilians. In 1982 he led the illegal invasion of Lebanon by the Israeli army. But in a world of power politics where 'might makes it right', he will not be facing a war crimes tribunal any time soon.

Israel is not alone. NATO has its own war crimes and criminals to confront, particularly in the conduct of its war on Serbia, and its actions in regard to Iraq and Libya. Other examples are its supplying highly sophisticated weaponry to countries such as Israel where they are used to surpress the civil population and  support for the dictator Augusto Pinochet who 'disappeared' many thousands of his own countrymen and abused the human rights of millions.

It is unlikely that the UN tribunal will investigate crimes such as these, let alone indict NATO leaders. The War Crimes tribunal has too many connections to Washington, London and other capitals of the western world. It is interesting to note that the first war crimes Justice was appointed by Madeline Albright, US Secretary of State, during the NATO bombing campaign. She is also renowned for her strong support of Israel.

The current tribunal is more of a star-chamber, than anything else, allowing  the NATO Allience to pursue its policy aims through branding selected opponants "War Criminals". This is illustrated by the blatant disregard by its Chief Prosecutor, of calls for an investigation into NATO war crimes brought forward by Amnesty International, and her unwillingness to hear evidence brought by a group of Canadian lawyers against Sharon.

The International tribunal remained remarkably silent
on other notable violators of human rights,
particularly in the Middle East.

Meanwhile Israeli bulldozers rumble through Palestinian villages, extra-judicial assassinations are carried out and the number of dead and wounded grows daily – the silent victims of Israel's use of military weapons against civilian populations. While all this is going on much of the western world cheers as Serbia's former leader is brought before the war crimes tribunal at The Hague.

Is this really what international justice is all about?

Continues >>>

| Top | Home | Al Habtoor Group | Metropolitan Hotels | Al Habtoor Automobiles |
|
Diamond Leasing | Emirates International School |
Designed and maintained by alMATRIX.com