Home
The Chairman's Message
Dubai Maritime City
Galloway Thrives Amid The Wolves
Egypt Signs Up To Democracy
The Fateful Cover Up
A Wish List On The New Federal Companies Law
City Of Culture
The Arab Alchemist
Woman Of Distinction
Al Jahiz
Mughal Paintings And Miniatures
Cannons
Saving The Arabian Leopard
Sports: Sailing In The Gulf
Engineering: Gold Crest Tower
The Emirates Week In Lebanon
Habtoor News
About Us
Back Issues

Contact Us

 

 

By: Linda S. Heard


  The special relationship between the British Isles and its superpower pal across the pond is surely the envy of all. Like a tango-dancing duo, the US leads and Britain seemingly delights in dancing to its tune no matter how discordant or garish.

  And like the buddies they are, when America was attacked on September 11, 2001, Britain behaved as though it was the 51st state, sending its soldiers off to seek a bearded millionaire troglodyte and a devilish nuke-wielding dictator; introducing Britain's answer to the Patriot Act and opening up a mini Guantanamo called Belmarsh.

  As part of his "shoulder to shoulder" commitment and to cement the 'special relationship', the British Prime Minister Tony Blair has liberally dug into the country's tax coffers, fallen out with his EU 'Old Europe' colleagues, been condemned as a possible war criminal by human rights organizations, termed 'a liar' by his parliamentary colleagues and 'a poodle' by his people.

  Naturally, the best relationships imply give and take, and this one is no exception. Britain gives and the US takes.

  We began to have an inkling of this weird imbalance when the Pentagon ignored British requests for the repatriation of Britons at Gitmo, and whereas American nationals, such as the so-called American Taliban John Walker Lindh was afforded a fair trial on his home ground, British detainees were locked up without access to family or lawyers.

  Then despite the US being Britain's partner in crime in Iraq – for a crime it surely is – George W. Bush refused to sign up to the International Criminal Court whereas Britons and the citizens of most other countries are governed by its jurisdiction.

  This means that senior members of the Blair government and members of the British armed services could one day find themselves alongside Slobodan Milosovich in The Hague for war crimes or human rights abuses committed by Americans during an illegal invasion with British participation.

  When it comes to bi-lateral and multi-lateral treaties, the Bush administration is famous for putting its own interests first. Prime examples are Kyoto on climate change, which Bush refuses to ratify and the Anti-ballistic missile (ABM) treaty he unilaterally shredded.

  The US government's self-interested trade policies are evident too. Remember the tariffs it imposed on imported steel in contravention of the World Trade Organization's rules, lifted in 2004 when the EU and Asia threatened to retaliate? Bush knew those tariffs were illegal, yet he went ahead anyway.

  Indeed, the current administration uses Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) as both carrots and sticks to bend smaller nations into doing its bidding and invariably those agreements end up being heavily weighted in America's favor.

  For instance, during its current negotiations over a bi-lateral FTA with the UAE, the US is demanding that the Emirates dispenses with the death penalty as a pre-condition. The hypocrisy inherent in this is, of course, glaring.

  Also glaringly one-sided are the terms of a 2003 extradition treaty signed by both the US and Britain for the ostensible purposes of fast-tracking the detention and conviction of terrorist suspects, while America demands prime facie evidence as a pre-requisite to sending its own citizens into the hands of foreign custodians, Britain merely requires a wink and a nod along with proof of the requested individual's identity.

  There's more. Although the original purpose of the treaty was to cut away red tape and shorten the time-frame when dealing with extraditable terrorist suspects, it is now being liberally used by the US to extradite the alleged perpetrators of white collar crimes, even if those offences were not committed in the US. Out of the 43 such requests made by the US to Britain since the treaty was invoked, half have involved alleged white collar criminals.

  There are several cases ongoing. The first relates to three former British bankers – David Bermingham, Giles Darby and Gary Mulgrew – known as "the Bermingham three".

  A Texas court has requested their extradition in relation to their alleged involvement with the Enron scandal at a time they were employed by the NatWest Bank, a subsidiary of the Royal Bank of Scotland Group. The men are suspected of plotting with Enron executives to persuade NatWest to sell its shares in a Cayman Island company to Enron for a rock-bottom sum.

  In the event there was a discrepancy between the US$1 million, which NatWest received for its stake and the US$20 million shelled out by Enron. The differential, alleges the Texan court, was pocketed by the Bermingham three along with Enron's Andrew Fastow and Michael Kopper.

  The Bermingham three's lawyer naturally defends his clients' innocence, but whatever the truth of the matter he makes an excellent point. The three are all British nationals, their alleged offence took place in Britain and their former employer was a British bank. But, nevertheless, the British Home Secretary Charles Clarke is prepared to hand them over to the jurisdiction of a foreign court on seven counts of wire fraud without batting an eyelid.

  The trio, on the other hand, are prepared to fight tooth and nail to stay in Britain given the murky reputation of the Texas legal system, and are prepared to appeal the Home Secretary's decision before the House of Lords and, should that be unsuccessful, before the European Court of Human Rights. Furthermore, they say that if they were to be brought up before a British court, their case would not stand up.

  Another Briton who may have to pack his suitcase and head across the Atlantic is Gary McKinnon of north London. The US Department of Defense has accused McKinnon of hacking into 97 Pentagon, Army, Navy and NASA computers between February 2001 and March 2002 thus triggering almost a million dollars losses.

  McKinnon was arrested in Britain during 2002 and released without charge but, once again, the US government is relentlessly pursuing its prey, ignoring the fact that the treaty was set-up to cover violent crimes and terrorism.

  Karen Todner, McKinnon's lawyer, said: "We believe that as a British national, he should be tried here in our own courts by a British jury and not in the US."

  Ian Norris, formerly the chief executive of the British engineering firm Morgan Crucible, is being head hunted by the US courts for alleged carbon price-fixing by two of Morgan Crucible's US subsidiaries between 1989 and 2000 even though such cartel activities were not deemed criminal offences in Britain until 2003.

  Like the others, Norris has appealed against extradition to the US and has been turned down, and like the others, he intends to take his case all the way up to the House of Lords.

  There are currently 19 non-Americans in US jails for violating anti-trust laws but Norris is the first to be sought for extradition. In the event the American request is successful, US prosecutors believe the flood gates could be opened for many other British executives to follow, especially since, under the treaty, there is no statute of limitation.

  And who knows where these onslaughts against price-fixers may lead. Conceivably, the day could arrive when the US decides that OPEC is a price-fixing cartel and consequently goes after it.

  The May 12 Economist quotes deputy assistant attorney-general Scott Hammond as telling a conference on white-collar crime: "To have the UK to be the first government to bat for us in seeking extradition is remarkable."

  Yes, it surely is remarkable. Indeed, the UK government appears to be selfless when it comes to handing over its own citizens to foreigners without requiring similar courtesies in return and ratifying treaties that offer its co-signatory most of the cream, provided that co-signatory is the US.

  If well-heeled, educated white collar executives are being hauled off to face justice American-style, then what chance do British Muslims accused of terrorist activities have?

  Under the 2003 Treaty, a British judge has ruled that 31-year-old Babar Ahmad, a computer whiz from London, is ripe for extradition to the US due to claims that he used Internet sites in order to incite the murder of US servicemen.

  Judge Timothy Workman, who denied Ahmad's appeal against the proposed extradition, gave the impression that he wasn't too happy with his own ruling but due to the provisions of the treaty, his hands were tied.

  "This is a difficult and troubling case," he told the court. "The defendant is a British subject, who is alleged to have committed offences, which, if the evidence were available, could have been prosecuted in this country. Nevertheless, the Government of the United States is entitled to seek his extradition under the terms of the treaty and I'm satisfied that…none of the statutory bars apply…"

  The case has caused outrage among the British Muslim community and led to a series of street protests. Iqbal Sacranie, the Secretary-General of the Muslim Council of Britain commented: "This is a very sad day for all who value fairness and justice. The US can now simply order that British citizens be plucked from our streets and into US jails by making serious and wholly unproven allegations against them."

  Someone who knows all about serious and unproven allegations is Derek Bond, a British grandfather and retired engineering consultant in his mid-70s who spent three weeks in a South African jail on the say-so of the FBI. Bond had set-off on a dream vacation with his wife but before he had time to unpack, he was arrested.

  The US told the South Africans that the man they had in custody wasn't really Derek Bond but a fraudster called Derek Sykes. The weeks went past and the FBI didn't even bother to turn up to interrogate 'their man' and if it wasn't for the fact the real Derek Sykes was discovered in Las Vegas, who knows, Mr. Bond could still be behind bars.

  It is surely time for the so-called 'special relationship' between Britain and the US to be re-assessed. Britons can be forgiven for thinking 'with friends like these who needs enemies?' But to be fair, the US isn't wholly to blame. It has been allowed to get away with behaving in any which way it pleases by a sycophantic Downing Street.

  Recently, Mr. Blair went to Washington to draw on his political capital with George Bush – or, rather the political capital he thought he had – over climate change and an end to poverty in Africa. He returned with a fist-full of dollars, representing a drop in the ocean when compared to the sums the White House spends on wars, and little else.

  Earlier, he had hoped that Bush would take a personal interest in the creation of a Palestinian state but all he got was plenty of lip-service.

  The special relationship is nothing more than a one-way street with Britons as the losers. Indeed, the Prime Minister's masochism has become an embarrassment.

  Margaret Thatcher was fond of saying 'this lady's not for turning' but in Blair's case he should make a U-turn and fast, starting with the tearing up of a treaty that takes British bankers, computer experts and engineers away from their families, friends and lawyers and places them before American courts without any evidence of wrong-doing.

  The greatest irony is surely this. The Bush administration is concerned about getting its mitts on Britons involved in price-fixing cartels, yet thought nothing about supporting Ahmad Chalabi's bid for the leadership of Iraq, even while he was wanted by Jordan for embezzlement. Furthermore, it installed as its ambassador there John Negroponte, one of the main players in the Iran-Contra scandal.

  Sad to say, there is only one thing special about Britain's relationship with the US and that's the frequency with which the British Prime Minister gets to chew burgers at Crawford and choke back his nation's pride.

   

| Top | Home | Al Habtoor Group | Metropolitan Hotels | Al Habtoor Automobiles |
|
Diamond Leasing | Emirates International School |